'AITA for asking my son and his soon to be wife what he says is ridiculous request?'

In a recent family conflict, a father is facing criticism after requesting that his son and future daughter-in-law pay to use his winter cabin for their honeymoon. The father, now the sole owner of the cabin following his wife’s passing, initially agreed to let the couple use the cabin but insisted they pay for its use, citing ongoing maintenance costs. His son, already feeling strained due to financial difficulties in planning the wedding, reacted negatively to the request, arguing that the cabin belonged to both parents and accusing his father of being materialistic and selfish.

The father defended his decision, pointing out his ownership and the financial responsibilities he shoulders for the property. He mentioned a similar arrangement with another family member, seeing it as fair and practical given the circumstances. However, this led to further friction as the son felt his father was unsupportive, especially after what he perceived as a lack of assistance during the wedding planning.

The situation escalated when the son shared his grievances with other family members, leading to widespread criticism of the father’s stance. Many family members have sided with the son, viewing the request for payment as unreasonable and insensitive, particularly for an occasion as significant as a honeymoon.

Amidst the heated exchanges, underlying tensions regarding the son’s marital decisions and the dynamics of familial support have come to the forefront. The father’s insistence on payment for cabin use has sparked a broader discussion within the family about expectations, financial boundaries, and the emotional toll of such disagreements during significant life events.

As both sides navigate their perspectives and feelings, the family is grappling with reconciling financial obligations, emotional support, and the legacy of the cabin within the context of their relationships.

Read for more info Reddit