‘AITA for not going out to eat with coworker anymore because she embarrasses me?’
In this scenario, the person facing the dilemma is a surveyor currently on a travel project, partnered with a coworker named Sam. While Sam is generally competent and pleasant at work, the issue arises during their frequent meals out together. Sam consistently exhibits behavior that the narrator finds embarrassing: she regularly complains about her meal or drink, often sending items back for seemingly trivial reasons or demanding discounts and extra items. This behavior culminates in confrontations with restaurant staff, including requests to see managers when her demands are not met.
Feeling uncomfortable and embarrassed by Sam’s behavior during these outings, the narrator eventually decides to stop joining her for meals altogether. When pressed for an explanation, the narrator reluctantly tells Sam that her conduct at restaurants is embarrassing. This leads to a confrontation, with Sam becoming angry and their work relationship becoming strained as a result.
From an outsider’s perspective, the narrator’s decision to discontinue joining Sam for meals seems justified. Sam’s behavior not only creates tension and discomfort for the narrator but also potentially affects their professional reputation when dining out as representatives of their company. While it’s understandable that Sam would react negatively upon hearing this criticism, her ongoing behavior suggests a lack of awareness or consideration for how her actions impact others.
In conclusion, while the narrator may have caused some friction in their work relationship by addressing the issue directly, their decision to avoid further embarrassment and discomfort during meals is reasonable and not necessarily indicative of being in the wrong (not the asshole). Addressing such interpersonal challenges tactfully can be difficult but necessary for maintaining a harmonious work environment.
Read for more info Reddit
Let’s find out.
savage897 writes:
maroonground writes: