In this scenario, the situation revolves around a man who started a relationship with a woman he met on Tinder, which turned serious when she became pregnant. Despite the child not being his, he opted to continue supporting her emotionally and in terms of childcare, but drew a clear line at financial responsibility, insisting the biological father should be pursued for child support.
The man made it clear from the beginning that he wouldn’t financially support the child, though he was willing to help with childcare duties. He encouraged his girlfriend to seek child support from the biological father, even though she was initially reluctant due to their friendship. As time passed and her savings dwindled, she eventually followed his advice and pursued child support.
This decision led to fallout: the biological father’s fiancee discovered the situation and is considering ending their relationship. The financial repercussions for the biological father were significant, prompting emotional distress and accusations directed towards the man for “ruining” his life.
The man finds himself conflicted. He loves his girlfriend and the baby, and is committed to their well-being, but feels justified in not assuming financial responsibility when the biological father is available and capable of providing support. His girlfriend, however, blames him for the fallout and the distress caused to the biological father.
In the eyes of many observers, the man’s stance on financial responsibility might be seen as reasonable, given the circumstances. However, his insistence on pursuing child support, while legally valid, has undoubtedly caused significant emotional and relational turmoil. Whether he is viewed as the “asshole” hinges largely on individual perspectives regarding financial and moral obligations in such complex familial dynamics.
Read for more info Reddit
Info from OP:
Here’s how people judged OP:
ColdstreamCapple writes:
SecretJealous4342Â writes:
LCJ75Â writes:
