Bride told one of the bridesmaids to cover up scares for her wedding.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

When planning a wedding, accommodating the needs of all guests can become a complex issue, especially when dealing with unique emotional and psychological challenges. In a recent instance, a bride had to make a difficult choice regarding a bridesmaid with obvious scars and a niece whose severe anxiety was a result of those scars.

Advertisement

The bride considered asking the bridesmaid to cover her scars with special tights to prevent triggering the niece’s anxiety during the event. This approach was intended to ensure the niece’s comfort, given her extreme sensitivity to visual triggers. However, this proposal was met with criticism from various perspectives.

Critics argued that accommodating such a specific trigger might be impractical, particularly in a public setting like a wedding. They pointed out that it’s challenging to control every possible trigger in a public space and that the bride’s efforts might be futile if other guests inadvertently expose their scars. Some suggested that the bride should prepare the niece for the possibility of seeing scars and provide a quiet space for her to retreat if needed, rather than adjusting the event to this extent.

Advertisement

Others emphasized that it might be unreasonable to expect a bride to alter her wedding plans to accommodate one guest’s severe anxiety, especially when it involves altering another guest’s attire. They suggested that the niece should be made aware of the potential for encountering visible scars and decide whether to attend based on her ability to cope with her triggers.

Advertisement

In summary, while the bride’s intention to support her niece is commendable, the feasibility of accommodating such specific needs at a large event like a wedding is questioned. Balancing the needs of all attendees and managing expectations realistically is crucial in such scenarios, ensuring that the event remains enjoyable and manageable for everyone involved.

What do you think? This is what top commenters had to say:

[deleted] said:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement