In this scenario, it’s important to acknowledge the perspectives of both partners. The couple, engaged with a 20-month-old son and planning for a second child, faced a dilemma regarding financial responsibilities during maternity leave. Initially, the partner with higher earnings proposed that the other take a full year off for maternity leave, with the expectation that expenses would continue to be split 50/50 during this time. This plan would have placed a financial strain on the partner taking maternity leave, particularly in the latter part of the year when income would decrease significantly.
The partner opting for maternity leave felt this arrangement was unfair, given the sacrifice of full income for childcare responsibilities. They expressed a desire for a more equitable distribution of financial responsibilities, suggesting that if they were to stay at home, the other partner should cover a greater share of expenses. This proposal led to a disagreement, with both partners feeling their stance was reasonable.
After discussion, a compromise was reached. The partner taking maternity leave would do so for four months, during which the other partner would cover 100% of expenses. During the initial six weeks, both partners would be off work, and expenses would continue to be split as usual. This compromise addresses the financial concerns of the partner taking leave while also considering the needs and limitations of both individuals.
Overall, while disagreements arose initially, the couple effectively communicated and reached a compromise that acknowledges the financial implications of maternity leave while also maintaining fairness and partnership in their relationship.
Read for more info Reddit
What do you think? AITA? This is what top commenters had to say:
