"AITA for not inviting someone for dinner because she said she wouldn't eat at my home on social media?"

In this scenario, it seems that Rose made a public display of her aversion to dining at homes with cats through social media, utilizing popular phrases and emojis. This reaction was prompted by a picture showing a cat near the cooking area in the host’s home. The host, feeling that Rose’s stance was clear, decided not to invite her to a dinner party they hosted, reasoning that since Rose doesn’t eat at homes with cats, there was no point in extending an invitation.

When Rose found out about the event through social media posts, she confronted the host, accusing them of exhibiting “high school mean girl vibes.” The host defended their decision, highlighting Rose’s previous statements about not dining at homes with cats. Rose argued that she could have attended without eating, but the host pointed out that her stance was clear, and it wouldn’t have been enjoyable for her to attend an event where she couldn’t fully participate.

Despite the host’s explanation, Rose continued to portray them negatively to others, suggesting they were engaging in clique-like behavior. The host, however, maintains that their decision was based on Rose’s own statements and preferences. Overall, while Rose may feel excluded, the host’s decision not to invite her seems justified given Rose’s expressed aversion to dining in homes with cats.

Read for more info Reddit