"AITA for not letting my separated husband be involved with my pregnancy?"

In a challenging situation, a woman is navigating the complexities of a pregnancy with her separated husband, Jack. After a brief reconciliation led to her becoming pregnant, the couple, who are mid-thirties and have been separated for some time, have decided that their marriage cannot be salvaged. Although they both agree that a divorce is the best course of action, they are unable to finalize it until after the baby is born.

Despite their separation, they have agreed to pursue joint custody of their child. The woman is committed to ensuring Jack remains an active and involved father, but she has made it clear that she does not want him present at medical appointments or during the birth. Her decision stems from a desire to minimize stress and complications during her pregnancy, which has already involved some issues, although nothing severe.

She has communicated to Jack that while he will receive updates and photographs of the pregnancy, and will be able to see the baby once born, she does not wish for him to touch her or be physically present during labor or medical procedures. Jack feels hurt by these boundaries, interpreting them as an attempt to exclude him from the pregnancy and his child’s early life.

The woman’s perspective is that, given the emotional and physical stress of the situation, she has the right to dictate her own comfort and boundaries during this sensitive time. Her primary concern is the health and well-being of both herself and her baby, and she intends to fulfill her commitment to co-parenting while maintaining her own well-being.

Read for more info Reddit

'AITA for not letting my separated husband be involved with my pregnancy?'

A woman, who is pregnant and facing challenges in her relationship, decided to exclude her partner from attending prenatal appointments and being present during labor and delivery. She felt that his presence would cause her stress, which she believed would be detrimental to both her and the baby’s well-being. The decision was not made lightly, as she acknowledged the importance of emotional support during such vulnerable times.

Her decision received varied reactions. Some commentators supported her choice, emphasizing that the primary purpose of having someone present during labor and delivery is to provide emotional support. They agreed that if his presence caused her distress, it was better for him not to be there. Others acknowledged that while it might seem harsh, her decision was justified given the stress she experienced around him, which could negatively impact her pregnancy.

One commentator highlighted the detrimental effects of stress during pregnancy, even comparing it to the harm caused by certain drugs. They advised her to prioritize her health and the baby’s well-being, suggesting that she and her partner seek family counseling to address their issues. Overall, the consensus was that she was not at fault for making a decision that prioritized her and her baby’s health and well-being.