“AITA for calling my work-teammate unprofessional because of her puppy?”

In this scenario, the main character, a PhD candidate and leader of a research team, finds himself facing challenges due to a team member, Chole, bringing her puppy, Bean, to work. The team has been stretched thin due to maternity leaves, and Chole’s decision to bring her puppy to the office has led to disruptions in meetings, missed deadlines, and decreased productivity. Despite the puppy’s disruptive behavior, Chole insists on bringing it to work due to its neediness.

The protagonist initially allows Chole to bring the puppy to the office, despite its disruptive behavior, as there is no policy against it and no objections from other team members. However, the situation worsens as the puppy continues to disrupt work, causing messes and distracting team members. The protagonist eventually gives Chole a warning about the untenability of the situation and insists she find an alternative arrangement for the puppy.

Chole’s response is to become upset and ultimately miss work, citing her reluctance to leave the puppy alone. She accuses the protagonist of being unsupportive and unprofessional for not advocating for her and the puppy. Despite Chole’s emotional reaction, the protagonist stands firm in his decision, emphasizing the need for professionalism and productivity in the workplace.

In summary, while the protagonist’s actions may seem harsh to Chole, they are ultimately necessary to maintain a productive work environment. Chole’s insistence on prioritizing her puppy over her work responsibilities has led to disruptions that cannot be tolerated in a professional setting. Therefore, the protagonist is not the asshole (NTA) in this situation.

Read for more info Reddit

Here’s what top commenters had to say about this one:

matrixx17 said:

rizzo1987 said: