“AITA for causing my ex-gf’s husband (also, my previous best friend) to cry at the bar?”

Based on the situation described, the question arises whether the individual is at fault for causing their ex-girlfriend’s husband (who is also their former best friend) to cry at a bar during a wedding event. The backstory reveals a complex history involving deep personal relationships and emotional turmoil.

Initially, the individual had a significant relationship with Anne, which ended due to her infidelity, witnessed by Jared, who was then their mutual best friend. Following the breakup, the individual moved on, eventually marrying someone else and establishing a happy family life. Meanwhile, Jared began dating Anne, ultimately marrying her and expecting a child together.

At the recent wedding, tensions surfaced when Jared, in an inebriated state, expressed a desire to rekindle his friendship with the individual, stating he missed and loved him. The individual responded honestly, asserting that while they still cared, their decision to maintain distance remained unchanged. This candid response led Jared to break down emotionally in front of everyone present, causing discomfort among the wedding party and patrons at the bar.

Considering the circumstances, the individual’s actions stemmed from maintaining boundaries established after the breakup with Anne. Despite Jared’s plea for renewed friendship, the individual felt it necessary to uphold their decision to keep a distance due to the past hurt and subsequent changes in their lives. The emotional outburst from Jared, while understandable given his intoxicated state and emotional vulnerability, occurred publicly, impacting others around them.

In conclusion, while the individual’s response may have been necessary to protect their emotional well-being and current relationships, the manner in which it played out at the bar, causing Jared to cry, raises questions about the appropriateness of the setting and timing for such a conversation. However, considering the context of past betrayals and personal boundaries, the individual’s stance can be seen as justified, albeit the execution might have been handled with more sensitivity to Jared’s emotional state. Therefore, the judgment of whether the individual is at fault hinges on the balance between asserting boundaries and considering the impact on others’ feelings in a public setting.

Read for more info Reddit

Here’s what top commenters had to say about this one:

Prudii_Skirata said:

Performance_Lanky said: