In the situation described, the father is facing criticism for not compensating his 20-year-old daughter for babysitting her younger twin brothers, who are 5 years old, three times a week. The daughter, who lives rent-free in her father’s house and has her college tuition paid for, expressed feeling overwhelmed and stressed by the additional responsibility of childcare, which she feels interferes with her studies.
The father, in response to his daughter’s complaints, compared her situation unfavorably to his own experiences as a student and parent, implying that she should manage her responsibilities without additional compensation. He justifies his stance by citing the financial support he already provides her, arguing that this should suffice as an allowance.
When the daughter sought support from her aunt (father’s sister), the aunt advocated for compensating her niece for the extra chores, suggesting that living rent-free and having college paid for does not equate to payment for additional responsibilities like babysitting.
The father perceives his daughter’s request for compensation as unreasonable, viewing it through the lens of his own past struggles and the benefits he currently provides. He sees her role in the household, including babysitting, as part of her familial responsibilities rather than tasks that warrant monetary compensation.
From an outsider’s perspective, the father’s position appears somewhat rigid and dismissive of his daughter’s concerns. While providing housing and tuition support is significant, the daughter’s workload and stress related to babysitting should be acknowledged and possibly negotiated rather than brushed off as entitlement. A compromise that respects both parties’ perspectives on responsibilities and support could foster a more harmonious family dynamic.
Read for more info Reddit
Here’s what people had to say:
eikerir writes:
amiethef0restf4iry writes:
DrAniB20Â writes:
