“AITA For “ruining” my kid’s life after she ruined a dress?”
In this scenario, the father, Ex (31) and his daughter C (16), visit Ex’s sister (Sis), who recently received a cherished wedding dress as a gift from their deceased grandmother. Despite being told not to, C tries on the dress and damages it irreparably by cutting it to get out after getting stuck. The dress was a handmade, sentimental piece valued at $12,000, and the grandmother had invested considerable time and emotion into creating it.
In response, the father enforces a family rule: C must pay for what she broke. He transfers $12,000 from C’s savings to have a new dress made by their aunt and also allocates $3,000 as compensation for emotional distress caused to Sis. Despite C’s protests and appeals about her college fund, the father stands firm, emphasizing the importance of responsibility and consequences for actions. He also reveals that C’s destruction of the dress was driven by envy and spite toward her late grandmother’s gesture toward Sis.
The father’s decision sparks disagreement from his ex-wife initially, but after understanding the severity of the damage and C’s deliberate actions, she aligns with his stance. The incident profoundly affects the family dynamics, leading to C being sent to therapy to address her behavior and the underlying issues that prompted her destructive actions.
Overall, while the father’s actions may seem harsh to some, particularly regarding the financial impact on C’s future, he stands by the principle of accountability and the significance of honoring sentimental family heirlooms. The aftermath underscores the complex emotional fallout within the family, highlighting the need for reconciliation and healing moving forward.
Read for more info Reddit
Before we give you OP’s updates, let’s take a look at some of the top comments (and responses):
conch writes:
OP responds:
hiddendestiny writes:
OP responds:
littlegoldifhs writes:
OP responds:
And now, OP’s updates:
Update 1:
Update 2:
Update 3:
And now OP’s 4th update (longer):
OP’s 5th major update:
Readers continued to weigh in on OP’s updates:
CONFHr5 writes:
laforaaa writes:
glasowenz writes: