"AITA for refusing to change my wedding catering to accomdate my one vegan, gluten free guest?"

In the scenario presented, a couple, let’s call them Sarah and Daniel, are planning their wedding and have chosen a catering service that accommodates the dietary needs of their guests, including Daniel’s brother’s tree nut allergy. Sarah’s cousin, Meredith, informs her that she is now eating vegan and gluten-free for health reasons and asks if the catering can be changed to accommodate her dietary preferences. Sarah, feeling that Meredith’s dietary choices are a trend and not a genuine need, refuses to change the catering and suggests Meredith eat beforehand if she doesn’t like the vegan, gluten-free option provided. When Meredith persists with suggestions for alternative catering companies, Sarah threatens to uninvite her from the wedding.

Sarah’s fiancé, Daniel, suggests that they could accommodate Meredith’s preferences without much hassle, as there are other catering options they liked. He sees Sarah’s reaction as petty and suggests letting it go. Sarah, however, sees her stance as a matter of principle, not just about the food but about not reinforcing what she perceives as selfish behavior.

In this situation, while Sarah may feel justified in her decision based on principle, her refusal to accommodate Meredith’s dietary preferences and the threat to uninvite her from the wedding could be viewed as overly harsh. Daniel’s perspective of being flexible and accommodating without much hassle seems reasonable, especially considering there are other catering options available. Ultimately, whether or not Sarah is considered an AH (asshole) may depend on individual perspectives, but a more diplomatic approach to addressing Meredith’s dietary needs might have avoided unnecessary conflict.

Read for more info Reddit