In this scenario, the protagonist finds themselves in a situation where they accompany their cousin to Costco, only for the cousin to have a meltdown after encountering her boss. The cousin becomes overwhelmed and distressed after her boss sees her buying toilet paper, fearing it could jeopardize her job due to concerns about maintaining privacy. Despite attempts to calm her down, the cousin spirals into hysterics, prompting the protagonist to resort to laughter as a coping mechanism.
The protagonist’s laughter exacerbates the situation, leading to a heated exchange where the cousin accuses them of being insensitive and unsupportive. Feeling attacked, the protagonist finds humor in the absurdity of the situation rather than engaging in further argument. However, this response further angers the cousin, leading to them driving off with the protagonist’s groceries.
Later, the protagonist seeks validation from their aunt, who acknowledges the cousin’s overreaction but suggests that an apology might be necessary to retrieve the groceries. This leaves the protagonist questioning their actions and whether they were in the wrong for laughing at their cousin’s distress.
Overall, the protagonist’s response to their cousin’s meltdown, while stemming from a desire to diffuse tension, inadvertently escalates the situation and strains their relationship. The fallout prompts them to reconsider their actions and contemplate extending an apology to mend fences.
Read for more info Reddit
Here were the top rated comments from readers in response to the OP’s post:
dunks615 said:
neobeguine said:
Thunderplant said:
